From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1991
172 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 1, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cohen, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed.

On this appeal, heard together with the People's appeals in People v. Oquendo ( 172 A.D.2d 566 [decided herewith]) and People v. Evans ( 172 A.D.2d 557 [decided herewith]), the People challenge the dismissal of an indictment on the ground that the defendant was deprived of her right to appear before the Grand Jury. As in People v. Oquendo (supra) and People v. Evans (supra), the defendant requested an opportunity to appear before the Grand Jury and was given a date on which to present herself, but her desire to appear before the Grand Jury was frustrated through actions of the Department of Correction, which returned her to the correctional facility without first allowing her to testify before the Grand Jury. The prosecutor presented the matter for a vote by the Grand Jury notwithstanding the defendant's non-appearance.

For the reasons stated in People v. Oquendo (supra), we conclude that the court properly dismissed the indictment. Bracken, J.P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1991
172 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. DANA DAVIS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Evans

We also consider whether the statutory right to appear was satisfied when the prosecutor offered these…

People v. Oquendo

Ordered that the order is affirmed. On this appeal, heard together with the People's related appeals in…