Opinion
October 3, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenzweig, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his in limine motion, made at the Wade hearing, to preclude the People from cross-examining him as to his meeting with the police immediately prior to being placed in the line-up at which he was identified by the complainant (see generally, People v Schwartzman, 24 N.Y.2d 241, 244, cert denied 396 U.S. 846; People v. Quevas, 178 A.D.2d 441, 442, revd on other grounds 81 N.Y.2d 41).
We find that the defendant's claim that the negotiated sentence was excessive is completely devoid of merit (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.