From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 7, 2000
274 A.D.2d 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

July 7, 2000.

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Assault, 1st Degree.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, WISNER AND HURLBUTT, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted.

Memorandum:

After the jury commenced deliberations, an alternate juror replaced a juror who was unable to continue serving because of illness. Because defendant did not consent in writing to the replacement, reversal is required ( see, CPL 270.35; People v. Page, 88 N.Y.2d 1, 3). We reject the People's contention that defendant was required to preserve the error for our review by timely objecting to the replacement. Preservation is not required because the error is one that affects "`the mode of proceedings prescribed by law'" ( People v. Ahmed, 66 N.Y.2d 307, 310, rearg denied 67 N.Y.2d 647, quoting People v. Patterson, 39 N.Y.2d 288, 295, affd 432 U.S. 197).

We reject defendant's contention that the evidence of intent is legally insufficient to support the conviction of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10). In view of our decision, we do not address defendant's remaining contention.


Summaries of

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 7, 2000
274 A.D.2d 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANTOINE DAVIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 7, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 925

Citing Cases

People v. Garbutt

Defendant's failure to preserve this issue is not fatal where, as here, the error "impact[s] on the…