From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. D'Aula

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 24, 1956
135 N.E.2d 587 (N.Y. 1956)

Summary

In People v. D'Aula (1 N.Y.2d 779), the court, over the objection of the District Attorney, permitted the defendant to plead guilty to a lesser degree of the crime charged in the indictment.

Summary of this case from People v. Foster

Opinion

Argued March 19, 1956

Decided May 24, 1956

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, CARMINE J. MARASCO, J.

C. Benn Forsyth for appellant.

Edward S. Silver, District Attorney ( William I. Siegel of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. D'Aula

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 24, 1956
135 N.E.2d 587 (N.Y. 1956)

In People v. D'Aula (1 N.Y.2d 779), the court, over the objection of the District Attorney, permitted the defendant to plead guilty to a lesser degree of the crime charged in the indictment.

Summary of this case from People v. Foster
Case details for

People v. D'Aula

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SALVATORE D'AULA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 24, 1956

Citations

135 N.E.2d 587 (N.Y. 1956)
135 N.E.2d 587
153 N.Y.S.2d 50

Citing Cases

People v. O'Connor

The only alleged defect is the failure of the prosecuting officer to state on the record his reasons for…

People v. Foster

This motion will be treated as an application in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis. In People v.…