From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Darby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 2003
304 A.D.2d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-04345

Submitted March 19, 2003.

April 14, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Miller, J.), rendered May 9, 2002, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Braatz, J.), upon her admission that she violated a condition thereof, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of driving while intoxicated.

Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Kevin L. Wright, District Attorney, Carmel, N.Y. (Mary Jane MacCrae of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit (see People v Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708). In addition, the defendant's admission to the violation of probation was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made (see People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9).

Since the defendant has completed the sentence imposed, the issue of whether that sentence was excessive has been rendered academic (see People v. Waddy, 240 A.D.2d 521).

SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, McGINITY, SCHMIDT and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Darby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 2003
304 A.D.2d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Darby

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. JANICE DARBY, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 14, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 486

Citing Cases

People v. Russillo

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in…

People v. Eherts

The defendant's contention that her admission to the violation of probation was involuntary is unpreserved…