From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Danny Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 2011
84 A.D.3d 1118 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-02154.

May 17, 2011.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), imposed February 25, 2010, pursuant to CPL 440.46, after a hearing, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon his plea of guilty, on November 26, 2002.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Bonnie H. Stein of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Diane R. Eisner, and Bruce Alderman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Covello, J.P., Eng, Chambers and Miller, JJ.


Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Taking into account all of the relevant circumstances, the resentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Benzeno, 83 AD3d 728; People v Graves, 66 AD3d 1513, 1514; People v Lara, 61 AD3d 894; People v Almanzar, 43 AD3d 825, 826; see also People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).


Summaries of

People v. Danny Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 2011
84 A.D.3d 1118 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Danny Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANNY ORTIZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 17, 2011

Citations

84 A.D.3d 1118 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 4277
923 N.Y.S.2d 341

Citing Cases

People v. Feliciano

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.Contrary to the defendant's contention, the resentencing court did…

People v. Feliciano

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the resentencing court did…