From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Daniels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 1993
194 A.D.2d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

June 15, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.).


Defendant's conviction is not barred on constitutional double jeopardy grounds because the antecedent proceedings under article 10 of the Family Court Act were civil in nature. Both a criminal and a civil sanction may be imposed for the same act or omission. "[T]he double jeopardy clause prohibits merely punishing twice, or attempting a second time to punish criminally, for the same offense" (Helvering v. Mitchell, 303 U.S. 391, 399; Matter of Barnes v. Tofany, 27 N.Y.2d 74, 77-78).

We have considered the defendant's remaining argument, and find it to be without merit.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Daniels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 1993
194 A.D.2d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VERNON DANIELS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1993

Citations

194 A.D.2d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
598 N.Y.S.2d 791

Citing Cases

People v. Morel

The sanctions within Article 10 which may be imposed in pending neglect proceedings are all civil in nature,…

People v. Lamica

While "the best practice would [have been] for [Supreme C]ourt to state on the record that defendant may…