From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cypress Hills Cemetery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2005
23 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-03835.

November 21, 2005.

In an action pursuant to Not-For-Profit Corporation Law § 112 to remove the board of directors of the Cypress Hills Cemetery, Ravi Batra, the former temporary receiver, appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated March 1, 2004, as granted the motion of the temporary receiver, Douglas Rosenberg, to settle Douglas Rosenberg's account, and denied certain branches of Ravi Batra's cross motion.

Ravi Batra, New York, N.Y., nonparty-appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek, Gerald A. Rosenberg, James Robert Pigott, Jr., and Robert R. Molic of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.

Wingate Kearney Cullen, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Richard J. Cea and Marina Picciocchi of counsel), for defendant-respondent Cypress Hills Cemetery.

Stanley K. Shapiro, New York, N.Y., for nonparty-respondent Douglas Rosenberg.

Zeicher Ellman Krause, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Stephen F. Ellman, pro se, and Kenneth C. Rudd of counsel), for nonparty-respondent Stephen F. Ellman.

Before: H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Mastro and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that Ravi Batra, whose temporary receivership in this case terminated simultaneously with the appointment of his successor Douglas Rosenberg, lacked standing to object to Rosenberg's final accounting ( see Society of Plastics Indus. v. County of Suffolk, 77 NY2d 761, 769). Further, Batra lacked standing to challenge the subsequent election of the Cypress Hills Cemetery's board of directors ( see N-PCL 618) and any alleged misconduct that may have occurred after his tenure ( see N-PCL 720 [b]; Tenney v. Rosenthal, 6 NY2d 204).

Batra's remaining contentions need not be addressed in light of our determination.


Summaries of

People v. Cypress Hills Cemetery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2005
23 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Cypress Hills Cemetery

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CYPRESS HILLS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2005

Citations

23 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 8963
807 N.Y.S.2d 598

Citing Cases

PEOPLE v. CYPRESS HILLS CEM

Decided September 14, 2006. Appeal from the 2d Dept: 23 AD3d 536. Motions for Leave To Appeal/Appeals…

Mittasch v. Long Island Greyhound Transfer, Inc.

Wyckoff, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 37, Not For Profit Corporation Law, p.…