From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cutter

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 2, 2016
499 Mich. 909 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 150859. COA No. 317355.

05-02-2016

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. David Wayne CUTTER, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 25, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the St. Clair Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Cutter

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 2, 2016
499 Mich. 909 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Cutter

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. David Wayne…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: May 2, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 909 (Mich. 2016)
878 N.W.2d 286

Citing Cases

Chase v. MaCauley

In contrast, other defendants who filed briefs around this time persisted in raising Alleyne claims. See,…