From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cummings, Sharpe, Accobacco, Kligerman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1944
59 N.E.2d 437 (N.Y. 1944)

Opinion

Argued October 9, 1944

Decided November 22, 1944

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, WALLACE, J.

James Cummings, appellant in person.

Abraham J. Gellinoff for John Sharpe, appellant.

Dominick Accobacco, appellant in person.

Isidore Meyer for Charles Kligerman, appellant.

Frank Hogan, District Attorney ( Ferdinand J. Wolf and Whitman Knapp of counsel), for respondent.


Upon the record before us we conclude that the trial court erred when it charged as a matter of law that the witnesses Kivowitz and Arnold were not accomplices of the defendants in the crime of concealing and withholding stolen property in New York County. That inquiry, we think, was one of fact for the jury. The judgments should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ.

Judgments reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Cummings, Sharpe, Accobacco, Kligerman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 22, 1944
59 N.E.2d 437 (N.Y. 1944)
Case details for

People v. Cummings, Sharpe, Accobacco, Kligerman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES CUMMINGS, JOHN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 22, 1944

Citations

59 N.E.2d 437 (N.Y. 1944)
59 N.E.2d 437

Citing Cases

State v. McKnight

This supposition is clearly justified in the case at bar." Compare: State v. Sweet, Ohio App., 36 N.E.2d 13,…