In State v. Cudahy Packing Company, 33 Mont. 179, 82 P. 833, 114 A.S.R. 804, a law was held invalid on account of a discriminative exemption proviso.
Summary of this case from McFarland v. CheyenneFebruary, 1923.
Present — Clarke, P.J., Dowling, Page, Merrell and Finch, JJ.
Judgment affirmed. No opinion.
In State v. Cudahy Packing Company, 33 Mont. 179, 82 P. 833, 114 A.S.R. 804, a law was held invalid on account of a discriminative exemption proviso.
Summary of this case from McFarland v. CheyenneFull title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CUDAHY PACKING…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Feb 1, 1923
Mr. L.A. Foot, Attorney General, and Mr. I.W. Choate, Assistant Attorney General, for the State, submitted a…
Vetter v. Benson CountyThis petitioner has not shown. State v. Cudahy Packing Co., 103 Minn. 419, 115 N.W. 645, 1039. Furthermore,…