Opinion
11-10-2016
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gilbert CRUZ, Defendant–Appellant.
The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Timothy P. Murphy of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Michael J. Flaherty, Jr., Acting District Attorney, Buffalo (Ashley R. Lowry of Counsel), for Respondent.
The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Timothy P. Murphy of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.
Michael J. Flaherty, Jr., Acting District Attorney, Buffalo (Ashley R. Lowry of Counsel), for Respondent.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, DeJOSEPH, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM:On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of rape in the second degree (Penal Law § 130.30[1] ), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is not valid, and he challenges the severity of the sentence. We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because Supreme Court failed to advise him properly of the potential period of postrelease supervision (see generally People v. Lococo, 92 N.Y.2d 825, 827, 677 N.Y.S.2d 57, 699 N.E.2d 416 ; People v. Thomas, 272 A.D.2d 985, 985–986, 708 N.Y.S.2d 681 ). Nevertheless, we conclude that the sentence, including the term of postrelease supervision, is not unduly harsh or severe. We note, however, that both the certificate of conviction and the uniform sentence and commitment form incorrectly recite that defendant was convicted of attempted rape in the second degree rather than the completed crime. The certificate of conviction and the uniform sentence and commitment form must therefore be amended to correct that clerical error (see People v. Peyatt, 140 A.D.3d 1680, 1680, 33 N.Y.S.3d 630 lv. denied 28 N.Y.3d 935, 40 N.Y.S.3d 363, 63 N.E.3d 83 ; People v. Maloney, 140 A.D.3d 1782, 1783, 32 N.Y.S.3d 410 ).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.