From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crump

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 20, 1980
74 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

February 20, 1980

Appeal from the Erie County Court.

Present — Cardamone, J.P., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Witmer and Moule, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without prejudice to a motion to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10. Memorandum: On his appeal from a judgment of conviction for criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree (Penal Law, § 165.45, subd 1), defendant seeks a reversal and a dismissal of the indictment under CPL 30.30 because of a delay of approximately 25 months. (Defendant was arrested on Feb. 4, 1977 and ordered held for the Grand Jury on Feb. 9, 1977 after a preliminary hearing. The trial did not commence until March 5, 1979.) No motion was made under CPL 30.30 before trial as required by CPL 210.20 (subd 2). Because the speedy trial issue may not be raised for the first time on appeal (see People v. Primmer, 46 N.Y.2d 1048; People v Adams, 38 N.Y.2d 605; People v. Pasquino, 65 A.D.2d 629), we reject this ground for reversal. The defendant also contends that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel in that his lawyer represented both him and a codefendant during the trial and the court failed to conduct the inquiry mandated by People v Gomberg ( 38 N.Y.2d 307) (see People v. Macerola, 47 N.Y.2d 257). Furthermore, defendant argues, his lawyer should have made the speedy trial motion under CPL 30.30, but failed to do so. There is no evidence in the record concerning the reasons for the delay in prosecution or counsel's failure to make the motion under CPL 30.30. Under these circumstances, "it would be better * * * that an appellate attack on the effectiveness of counsel be bottomed on an evidentiary exploration by collateral or postconviction proceeding brought under CPL 440.10". (People v. Brown, 45 N.Y.2d 852, 854.) Accordingly, we do not reach the issue of ineffective assistance, without prejudice to an application to Trial Term for consideration of such issues after a hearing in connection with a motion to vacate the judgment. We find no merit to defendant's other contentions.


Summaries of

People v. Crump

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 20, 1980
74 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Crump

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WENFRED CRUMP…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 20, 1980

Citations

74 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

People v. Rivera

The defendant and his codefendant, Manuel Garcia, were convicted of burglary in the third degree following a…

People v. Carter

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Under the circumstances the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel should…