From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crisler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 1097 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1957-1958/00) KA 00-01563 00-01571

December 21, 2001.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HURLBUTT, KEHOE AND LAWTON, JJ.


Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted, and orders entered December 27, 2000, are hereby vacated.

Memorandum:

Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel submitted to the People a copy of the brief together with the proposed stipulation to the record, and then revised the brief based upon comments from the People. Upon our review of the record before us, we agree. Therefore, the orders of December 27, 2000, are vacated and this Court will consider the appeals de novo ( see, People v. LeFrois, 151 A.D.2d 1046; see also, People v. Vasquez, 70 N.Y.2d 1, 4, rearg denied 70 N.Y.2d 748). Defendant is directed to perfect the appeal on or before April 22, 2002.


Summaries of

People v. Crisler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 1097 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Crisler

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANK CRISLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 21, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 1097 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
738 N.Y.S.2d 259

Citing Cases

People v. Crisler

Memorandum: We previously granted defendant's motion for a writ of error coram nobis, vacating two prior…

Crisler v. Burge

Though the Appellate Division vacated Petitioner's sentence with respect to the counts of Criminal Use of a…