From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crespo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 1999
267 A.D.2d 36 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

December 7, 1999

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Price, J.), rendered December 16, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 10 to 20 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence to a term of 6 to 12 years, and otherwise affirmed.

Ashley G. Marsh, for respondent.

Timothy Casey, for defendant-appellant.

SULLIVAN, J.P., NARDELLI, MAZZARELLI, LERNER, BUCKLEY, JJ.


During trial, the court excused the jury for 30 minutes, after admonishing the jurors against premature deliberations, while the court and counsel discussed an imminent holiday recess. With the express consent of both counsel, the court directed a court officer to advise the jurors to return after the weekend, and to remind them of the court's prior admonitions. Delegation of this minor ministerial matter did not constitute an improper delegation of judicial authority and did not require defendant's presence (see, People v. Bonaparte, 78 N.Y.2d 26, 31; People v. Bowles, 168 A.D.2d 562, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 953). "There is no indication in the record that the officer did anything more than he was asked to do" (People v. Sarasti, 228 A.D.2d 624, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 994), and the record sufficiently establishes that the court officer's communications with the jury were ministerial rather than substantive in nature (compare, People v. Mendez, 208 A.D.2d 358).

We find defendant's sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claim.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Crespo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 1999
267 A.D.2d 36 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Crespo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE CRESPO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 7, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 36 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
700 N.Y.S.2d 117

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Delegation of this minor ministerial matter did not constitute an improper delegation of judicial authority…

People v. Lopez

There was no improper delegation of judicial authority to a court officer when the court, with defense…