From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crespo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 7, 1989
153 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

August 7, 1989

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.).


Ordered that upon reargument, the judgment is affirmed.

By failing to challenge the sufficiency of his factual allocution before the trial court, the defendant has not preserved the issue for appellate review as a matter of law (see, People v Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662; People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636). In any event, "[a] bargained guilty plea to a lesser crime makes unnecessary a factual basis for the particular crime confessed" (People v. Clairborne, 29 N.Y.2d 950, 951; see, People v Tavarez, 151 A.D.2d 793). "`[T]here is no suggestion in the record or dehors the record that the guilty plea was improvident or baseless'" (People v. Moore, 91 A.D.2d 1050, quoting from People v. Fooks, 21 N.Y.2d 338, 350, cert denied sub nom. Robinson v. New York, 393 U.S. 1067). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Crespo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 7, 1989
153 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Crespo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JORGE CRESPO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 7, 1989

Citations

153 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

People v. Bray

; the denial of a motion for a separate trial (People v Smith, 41 A.D.2d 893); the factual specificity of an…

People v. Ballard

In any event, contrary to the defendant's contention, the record establishes that the defendant's plea of…