From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crespo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1990
158 A.D.2d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

February 5, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, his conduct in striking the store detective in the face when the detective tried to prevent him from leaving the store with a hairbrush which he had not paid for, constituted the physical force required to establish the crime of robbery (see, Penal Law § 160.00). The evidence clearly shows that the defendant used physical force during the course of the robbery for the purpose of "[p]reventing or overcoming resistance to the taking of the property or to the retention thereof immediately after the taking" (People v Washington, 148 A.D.2d 559, 560; see also, People v Johnstone, 131 A.D.2d 782; People v Dekle, 83 A.D.2d 522, affd 56 N.Y.2d 835). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Crespo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1990
158 A.D.2d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Crespo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD CRESPO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
551 N.Y.S.2d 57

Citing Cases

People v. Lawson

The defendant's further contention that the prosecution failed to prove that he used the physical force…

People v. Brown

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find…