From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crenshaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 1991
170 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

February 19, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's claim, the court, in imposing sentence, properly considered evidence of uncharged drug incidents involving the defendant presented at a pretrial hearing (see, People v York, 162 A.D.2d 748; People v Cunningham, 153 A.D.2d 700; People v Marrero, 110 A.D.2d 785, 786). Since the sentence imposed was within the range of the applicable sentencing statute, and not excessive under the circumstances of the case, we decline to disturb it (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) or without merit (see, People v Elliott, 65 N.Y.2d 446, 448). Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Crenshaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 1991
170 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Crenshaw

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARNOLD CRENSHAW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 19, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Rachles

Any undue prejudice was avoided by the trial court's repeated and emphatic charges to the jury that the…