From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 5, 1993
190 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

February 5, 1993

Appeal from the of Erie County Court, D'Amico, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Green, Lawton, Boehm and Doerr, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court's failure to strike the testimony of the police officer concerning seizure of a handgun did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. Although the complainant did testify about being held at gunpoint by defendant and James Garner, defendant was not charged with possession of a handgun. In any event, in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, the error, if any, was harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230). We also conclude that, although testimony by several police officers constituted improper bolstering of complainant's testimony, that error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt (see, People v Johnson, 57 N.Y.2d 969; People v Marks, 182 A.D.2d 1122; People v Williams, 154 A.D.2d 935, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 778).

The other issues raised by defendant either have not been preserved or are without merit (see, People v Garner, 190 A.D.2d 994 [decided herewith]; see also, People v Garner, 190 A.D.2d 1041 [decided herewith]).


Summaries of

People v. Cray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 5, 1993
190 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Cray

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LESLIE CRAY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1993

Citations

190 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
593 N.Y.S.2d 621

Citing Cases

People v. Giles

Defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that police witnesses bolstered the…