From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Craig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 2001
281 A.D.2d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted February 7, 2001.

March 5, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), rendered August 26, 1999, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (James H. Miller III of counsel), for appellant.

James M. Catterson, Jr., District Attorney, Riverhead, N Y (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the County Court erred in failing to order a hearing into the circumstances surrounding his discharge from the Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC) program is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Mackey, 77 N.Y.2d 846; People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662; People v. Brown, 242 A.D.2d 337), and, in any event, without merit (see, People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Craig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 2001
281 A.D.2d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Craig

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. ISAAC CRAIG, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 5, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 266

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

Thus, we reverse and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a proper inquiry, and for a new…

People v. Freese

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in failing to…