From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Corrica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 10, 1997
237 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 10, 1997.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered October 2, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal sale of a firearm in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Thompson, J.P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge to the closure of the courtroom during the testimony of an undercover officer is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see, CPL 470.05; People v Hammond, 208 AD2d 559; People v Brown, 178 AD2d 647).

The court's discharge of two sworn jurors constituted a provident exercise of the court's discretion ( see, CPL 270.35; People v Rodriguez, 71 NY2d 214; People v Buford, 69 NY2d 290; People v Jamison, 203 AD2d 385).

The defendant's remaining contentions lack merit.


Summaries of

People v. Corrica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 10, 1997
237 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Corrica

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SEAN CORRICA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 10, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 434

Citing Cases

People v. Tuzinowski

The standard under CPL 270.35 for discharging a juror as grossly unqualified to serve "is satisfied only…

People v. Jenkins

In any event, his contention is without merit. The standard for discharging a juror as grossly unqualified to…