From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Corey A. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 2011
83 A.D.3d 1577 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

April 29, 2011.

Appeal from a judgment of the Orleans County Court (James P. Punch, J.), rendered April 19, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the third degree.

Present — Scudder, P.J., Fahey, Carni, Green and Gorski, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25), defendant contends that County Court improperly considered prior criminal charges that did not result in convictions when it imposed sentence and thus that the sentence is illegal. Defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal does "not encompass the right to challenge the legality of the sentencing procedure on appeal" ( People v Nicholson, 237 AD2d 973, 974, lv denied 90 NY2d 908), nor is preservation required to challenge the legality of a sentence ( see generally People v Samms, 95 NY2d 52, 56). Nevertheless, the record does not support defendant's contention.


Summaries of

People v. Corey A. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 2011
83 A.D.3d 1577 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Corey A. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. COREY A. BROWN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 29, 2011

Citations

83 A.D.3d 1577 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
921 N.Y.S.2d 586

Citing Cases

People v. McKnight

In contrast, we further note that defendant waived his right to appeal in appeal No. 2, and we conclude that…

People v. McKnight

In contrast, we further note that defendant waived his right to appeal in appeal No. 2, and we conclude that…