From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Corbin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 11, 2001
284 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued May 3, 2001

June 11, 2001

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered April 12, 1999, convicting him of murder in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Winston McIntosh of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Michael Gore, and Joseph Huttler of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly refused to charge the jury concerning dying declarations because the statements at issue were admitted both as dying declarations and excited utterances. Unlike dying declarations, excited utterances do not require special instructions to the jury (see, Letendre v. Hartford Acc. Indem. Co., 21 N.Y.2d 518, 524-525).


Summaries of

People v. Corbin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 11, 2001
284 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Corbin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. VERE CORBIN, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 11, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 282

Citing Cases

People v. Medina

e shooter, were "not made under the impetus of studied reflection" ( People v Edwards, 47 NY2d 493, 497; see…

People v. Jones

The trial court, which properly admitted as an excited utterance the victim's statement at the scene of the…