From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Copus

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. First Division
Jan 29, 1975
322 N.E.2d 550 (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)

Summary

In People v. Copus (1975), 24 Ill. App.3d 1045, this court in an abstract opinion relied on People v. Amerman for the rule that the question of the constitutionality of the statute is properly preserved for review only when it has been raised in and passed upon by the trial court.

Summary of this case from People v. Koppen

Opinion

Nos. 73-291, 73-295 cons. Judgments affirmed.

January 29, 1975. Abstract of Decision

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Stephenson County; the Hon. WESLEY A. EBERLE, Judge, presiding.

Ralph Ruebner, of State Appellate Defender's Office, of Elgin, for appellants.

William Sisler, State's Attorney, of Freeport (James W. Jerz and Martin P. Moltz, both of Illinois State's Attorneys Association, of counsel), for the People.


Abstract of Decision


Summaries of

People v. Copus

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. First Division
Jan 29, 1975
322 N.E.2d 550 (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)

In People v. Copus (1975), 24 Ill. App.3d 1045, this court in an abstract opinion relied on People v. Amerman for the rule that the question of the constitutionality of the statute is properly preserved for review only when it has been raised in and passed upon by the trial court.

Summary of this case from People v. Koppen
Case details for

People v. Copus

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HOWARD COPUS…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. First Division

Date published: Jan 29, 1975

Citations

322 N.E.2d 550 (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)
24 Ill. App. 3d 1045

Citing Cases

People v. Koppen

We are in agreement with the holding in People v. Nelson (1975), 26 Ill. App.3d 227, 230, that the…