From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Considine

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Dec 21, 2018
167 A.D.3d 1554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

1313 KA 18–00289

12-21-2018

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Martin CONSIDINE, II, Defendant–Appellant.

DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (JOSEPH G. FRAZIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. CAROLINE A. WOJTASZEK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (JOSEPH G. FRAZIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.

CAROLINE A. WOJTASZEK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDERIt is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the sentence and as modified the judgment is affirmed and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Niagara County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated as a class E felony ( Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1192[3] ; 1193[1][c][i][A] ). Defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate term of 1 to 3 years' imprisonment, a consecutive one-year conditional discharge, and a fine of $1,000. That sentence is illegal because the conditional discharge term must be three years under these circumstances (see Penal Law §§ 60.21, 65.05[3][a] ; Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1193[1][c][iii] ). Although the issue is not raised by either party, we cannot allow an illegal sentence to stand (see People v. Southard, 163 A.D.3d 1461, 1461, 76 N.Y.S.3d 869 [4th Dept. 2018] ; People v. Sellers, 222 A.D.2d 941, 941, 635 N.Y.S.2d 773 [3d Dept. 1995] ). We therefore vacate the sentence and remit the matter to Supreme Court to afford defendant the opportunity to either withdraw his plea or be resentenced to the legal term of conditional discharge (see Sellers, 222 A.D.2d at 941, 635 N.Y.S.2d 773 ; see generally People v. Ciccarelli, 32 A.D.3d 1175, 1176, 822 N.Y.S.2d 186 [4th Dept. 2006] ). Defendant's appellate contentions are academic in light of our determination.


Summaries of

People v. Considine

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Dec 21, 2018
167 A.D.3d 1554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Considine

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. MARTIN CONSIDINE, II…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Dec 21, 2018

Citations

167 A.D.3d 1554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 8834
90 N.Y.S.3d 792

Citing Cases

People v. Simpson

We note, however, that the court imposed an illegal sentence of 3½ to 7 years' imprisonment on defendant's…

People v. Harvey

According to the sentencing minutes, however, Supreme Court imposed a period of postrelease supervision in…