From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Conseillant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1711) KA 00-00343

December 21, 2001.

(Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Contiguglia, J. — Promoting Prison Contraband, 1st Degree.)

PRESENT: GREEN, J. P., KEHOE, BURNS, GORSKI AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of two counts of promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law § 205.20), and four counts of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05, [7]) and sentencing him as a persistent felony offender to concurrent terms of incarceration of 20 years to life on each count. Defendant contends that County Court erred in permitting him to waive his right to counsel and to proceed pro se, with the assistance of an attorney acting as his legal advisor throughout the pretrial proceedings and at trial. We disagree. The court conducted "a sufficiently 'searching inquiry'" of defendant ( People v. Sawyer, 57 N.Y.2d 12, 21, rearg dismissed 57 N.Y.2d 776, cert denied 459 U.S. 1178 ; cf., People v. Mitchell, 203 A.D.2d 948, 949, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 969).

Contrary to defendant's further contention, the conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence. The crimes were committed in the prison, and were witnessed by both inmates and correction officers. The injury to the inmate was a gash to the back of the head causing major bleeding and hospitalization. The injury to the correction officer was a hematoma to the side of the head causing pain and dizziness, requiring medical attention, hot and cold therapy and pain medication. Those injuries are sufficient to establish that each victim sustained a physical injury to support the conviction of two counts of assault ( see, People v. Gray, 189 A.D.2d 922, 923, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 886). We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that they lack merit.


Summaries of

People v. Conseillant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Conseillant

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 21, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 298

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

In our view, this evidence was clearly sufficient for the jury to have concluded that both Boynton and…

People v. LaDuca

He took over-the-counter medication for the pain in his knee for three or four days after the incident,…