Opinion
July 16, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the verdict sheet submitted to the jury was not proper is not preserved for appellate review since he consented to its submission (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Freeman, 162 A.D.2d 704; People v. Hallums, 157 A.D.2d 800; People v. Jusino, 152 A.D.2d 744; cf., People v. Nimmons, 72 N.Y.2d 830). Nor is reversal in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction warranted in this case (see, People v Canada, 157 A.D.2d 793; People v. Weatherly, 144 A.D.2d 509, 510).
We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Rubin, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.