From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Colon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 20, 1994
200 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

January 20, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic R. Massaro, J.).


The court did not abuse its discretion in enhancing defendant's sentence without giving him an opportunity to withdraw his guilty pleas, given his flight before sentencing (see, People v Malatesta, 172 A.D.2d 692; People v. Dremeguila, 166 A.D.2d 196, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 1020), subsequent arrest for murder and attempted murder (see, People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702), and knowledge that it was a condition of the plea agreement that he not "get into any trouble" while released on his own recognizance pending sentencing. The factual allocutions for both pleas were adequate and established that defendant understood the nature of the charges (People v. Moore, 71 N.Y.2d 1002). Finally, the sentences imposed were lawful and, in light of defendant's continuing unlawful behavior, not excessive.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Colon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 20, 1994
200 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Colon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAMON COLON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 20, 1994

Citations

200 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
606 N.Y.S.2d 644

Citing Cases

People v. Mack

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.). The court properly exercised its…

People v. Caridad

We reject defendant's claim that he had no opportunity to raise these issues before the sentencing court, and…