From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Collazo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1986
125 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

December 8, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Since the issues raised by the defendant concerning his plea of guilty were not presented to the court of first instance, those issues have not been preserved for our review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636). Review in the interest of justice is not warranted.

Moreover, there is no reason to disturb the bargained for sentence, which included the imposition of a $75 felony surcharge (see, People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816; People v. Barnes, 62 N.Y.2d 702). Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Collazo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1986
125 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Collazo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY COLLAZO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1986

Citations

125 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Burt

Defendant argues that the statute lacks a rational basis for this distinction and thus violates the Equal…