From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 27, 2000.

Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Smith, J. — Robbery, 3rd Degree.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., HURLBUTT, KEHOE AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a nonjury trial of robbery in the third degree (Penal Law § 160.05), attempted petit larceny (Penal Law § 110.00, 155.25), and two counts of petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25). County Court sentenced defendant as a second felony offender to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 2 to 4 years for the robbery count, one year for each count of petit larceny, and six months for the attempted petit larceny count.

Contrary to defendant's contention, the evidence is legally sufficient to support the robbery conviction ( see, People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495; People v. Broadwater, 105 A.D.2d 1065). The testimony of the cashier at the grocery store that defendant struck her, causing her to fall, provided the requisite evidence of force to support the robbery conviction ( see, People v. Brown, 266 A.D.2d 77, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 794). Further, the verdict convicting defendant of robbery in the third degree is not against the weight of the evidence ( see, People v. Bleakley, supra, at 495). The determination regarding the credibility of the witnesses is a task within the province of the fact finder, and its judgment should not be lightly disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record ( see, People v. Gruttola, 43 N.Y.2d 116, 122).

We agree with defendant, however, that the sentence imposed for attempted petit larceny is illegal. The maximum permissible sentence for attempted petit larceny, a class B misdemeanor ( see, Penal Law § 110.05; § 155.25), is a definite sentence of imprisonment not to exceed three months ( see, Penal Law § 70.15). Because the court expressly stated that it was sentencing defendant to the maximum sentence allowed, we modify the judgment by reducing the sentence imposed for attempted petit larceny to a determinate term of imprisonment of three months.


Summaries of

People v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ALBERT COLEMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 504

Citing Cases

People v. Whitted

Viewing the trial evidence in the light most favorable to the People, a rational jury could indeed have…

People v. Lee

ant who purchased the crack cocaine from defendant on both occasions, the People presented audio recordings…