From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1966
18 N.Y.2d 650 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Argued June 2, 1966

Decided July 7, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, DOMINIC S. RINALDI, J.

Eugene Gold for appellant.

Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney ( William I. Siegel of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.

Judge FULD dissents in the following memorandum in which Chief Judge DESMOND concurs:

I adhere to the views I expressed in People v. Dinan ( 11 N.Y.2d 350, 357) — that evidence should be excluded if obtained by interception of telephone communications in contravention of the Federal Communications Act, and, accordingly, vote to reverse the order appealed from.


Summaries of

People v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1966
18 N.Y.2d 650 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

People v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARL I. COHEN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 1966

Citations

18 N.Y.2d 650 (N.Y. 1966)
273 N.Y.S.2d 75
219 N.E.2d 427

Citing Cases

People v. Kaiser

In addition, thousands of eavesdropping orders have been issued in reliance upon the statute and the…

People v. Reiner

Motion granted; appeal dismissed. A wiretap order is "a proper subject of judicial review in the same manner…