From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cogswell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 2007
46 A.D.3d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 100102.

December 13, 2007.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Bruhn, J.), rendered November 21, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree.

Tara Brower Wells, Latham, for appellant.

Donald A. Williams, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


Satisfying a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to sexual abuse in the first degree and was sentenced as negotiated to six months in jail and 10 years of probation. Defendant now appeals, arguing that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. We disagree. Noting the reprehensible nature of the crime perpetrated on a child, we find neither an abuse of discretion by County Court nor the existence of any extraordinary circumstances justifying a modification of the agreed-upon sentence in the interest of justice ( see People v Ali-Rachedi, 34 AD3d 981, 981-982, lu denied 8 NY3d 878).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Cogswell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 2007
46 A.D.3d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

People v. Cogswell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEITH COGSWELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 13, 2007

Citations

46 A.D.3d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9817
846 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

People v. Stouten

Defendant now appeals, contending that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. We disagree.…

People v. Lewis

Inasmuch as defendant did not object or move to vacate the plea on this basis, he has failed to preserve this…