From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Coachman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2017
154 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

2015-11574.

10-25-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Curtis COACHMAN, appellant.

Del Atwell, East Hampton, NY, for appellant. Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Christine DiSalvo and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.


Del Atwell, East Hampton, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Christine DiSalvo and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., SANDRA L. SGROI, JEFFREY A. COHEN, and JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Minihan, J.), rendered October 19, 2015, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 341–342, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256–257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Thompson, 150 A.D.3d 1156, 1156–1157, 52 N.Y.S.3d 675 ).

Although a claim that a plea of guilty was not voluntary survives a valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Lujan, 114 A.D.3d 963, 964, 980 N.Y.S.2d 815 ), the defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, or intelligent, since he did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground prior to the imposition of sentence (see CPL 220.60[3] ; People v. Lujan, 114 A.D.3d at 964, 980 N.Y.S.2d 815 ). In any event, this contention is without merit.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel, except to the extent that the alleged ineffective assistance may have affected the voluntariness of his plea (see People v. Robinson, 144 A.D.3d 1055, 1056, 40 N.Y.S.3d 909 ; People v. Belle, 74 A.D.3d 1477, 1480, 902 N.Y.S.2d 258 ). To the extent that the defendant argues that the alleged ineffective assistance may have affected the voluntariness of his plea, his contention is without merit.

The defendant's challenge to the search warrant that led to his arrest is precluded by his valid appeal waiver (see People v. Russell, 128 A.D.3d 1383, 1384, 7 N.Y.S.3d 790 ; People v. Leigh, 71 A.D.3d 1288, 1288, 897 N.Y.S.2d 744 ), and, under the circumstances present here, forfeited by his plea of guilty (see generally People v. Fernandez, 67 N.Y.2d 686, 688, 499 N.Y.S.2d 919, 490 N.E.2d 838 ; People v. Guldi, 152 A.D.3d 540, 59 N.Y.S.3d 385 ; People v. Marinelli, 148 A.D.2d 550, 540 N.Y.S.2d 185 ).


Summaries of

People v. Coachman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2017
154 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Coachman

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Curtis COACHMAN, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 25, 2017

Citations

154 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
154 A.D.3d 957

Citing Cases

People v. King

Moreover, the defendant forfeited that claim by pleading guilty (seePeople v. Jessamy, 137 A.D.3d at 1056, 28…

People v. Scott

ORDERED that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently…