From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Clark

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 2011
31 Misc. 3d 152 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)

Summary

In People v. Clark, 31 Misc. 3d 152(A), *1, 2011 WL 2506461 (Sup. Ct., App. Term, 2nd Dept., 2011), the People had mailed the SOR to a previous and, therefore, incorrect address for defense counsel though they had been provided with notice of the change in counsel's address.

Summary of this case from People v. Ramirez

Opinion

June 17, 2011.


Crimes — Right to Speedy Trial — Determining Validity of Statement of Readiness. Criminal Procedure Law — § 30.30 (1) (Speedy trial; time limitations).


Summaries of

People v. Clark

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 2011
31 Misc. 3d 152 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)

In People v. Clark, 31 Misc. 3d 152(A), *1, 2011 WL 2506461 (Sup. Ct., App. Term, 2nd Dept., 2011), the People had mailed the SOR to a previous and, therefore, incorrect address for defense counsel though they had been provided with notice of the change in counsel's address.

Summary of this case from People v. Ramirez
Case details for

People v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:People v. Clark (Connie)

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 2011

Citations

31 Misc. 3d 152 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 51135

Citing Cases

People v. Morris

The People assert that they filed and served a statement of readiness off-calendar on August 10, 2018, along…

People v. Telemaque

Thus, none of the cases cited by the People are factually similar to the instant matter. Further, relying…