From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1996
223 A.D.2d 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

January 29, 1996

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County, Pirro, J., Murphy, J.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our review of the record, we find that the defendant voluntarily and intelligently waived her right to appeal the judgment of conviction in exchange for a lenient sentence, which was to run concurrently with the sentences imposed under two other indictments. Accordingly, the defendant cannot now challenge her convictions of burglary in the first degree and assault in the first degree as not supported by legally sufficient evidence or as being against the weight of the evidence ( see, People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1; People v Holman, 221 A.D.2d 469; People v Brewley, 211 A.D.2d 805). Rosenblatt, J.P., Hart, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1996
223 A.D.2d 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LISA CLARK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1996

Citations

223 A.D.2d 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 942

Citing Cases

People v. Povoski

We reject the contention of defendant that the waiver was ineffective because it was part of a plea bargain…

People v. Ciluffo

The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal the judgment of conviction…