From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cisco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 27, 1987
129 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

April 27, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his guilt was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. However, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied 469 U.S. 932), the evidence adduced at the trial showed that the defendant importuned a coconspirator to throw a military smoke-producing grenade, supplied by the defendant, through the living room window of a house at a time when he knew that its occupants would be asleep. The defendant was aware that upon its explosion the grenade would emit an intensely hot flame that was likely to set the living room carpet afire, and it was his intent that the home be damaged by the copious amount of smoke that the detonated grenade would produce. The explosion caused fire and smoke to spread throughout the house, which killed a woman and her three children.

With these facts before it, the jury was justified in determining that the defendant, under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life, recklessly engaged in conduct which created a grave risk of death to the members of the sleeping family (see, Penal Law § 125.25; People v Register, 60 N.Y.2d 270, 276-277, cert denied 466 U.S. 953; People v Licitra, 47 N.Y.2d 554, rearg denied 53 N.Y.2d 938; People v Leonardo, 89 A.D.2d 214, affd 60 N.Y.2d 683). This evidence was also sufficient to support a finding that the defendant intentionally damaged the house by starting a fire or causing an explosion (see, Penal Law § 150.10), thus establishing his guilt of arson in the third degree and, hence, felony murder (see, Penal Law § 125.25). Thus, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the evidence was of sufficient quality and quantity to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Lawrence, J.P., Weinstein, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cisco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 27, 1987
129 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Cisco

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY CISCO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 27, 1987

Citations

129 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Myers

in order to support a conviction for felony murder it need not be established that the defendant acted with…