From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Christian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1996
229 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 12, 1996

Appeal from the Erie County Court, D'Amico, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence, the law and the circumstances of this case, viewed in totality and at the time of the representation, reveal that defense counsel provided meaningful representation ( see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147; People v. Perkov, 227 A.D.2d 960). Defendant's challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence are not preserved for our review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10), and we decline to exercise our power to review those challenges as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see, CPL 470.15 [a]). The verdict is not contrary to the weight of the evidence ( see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). County Court properly denied the motion to dismiss the indictments pursuant to CPL 30.30 (1) (a). The court properly sentenced defendant as a second felony offender without conducting a hearing. Defendant was adjudicated a second felony offender following a previous conviction and that determination is binding on defendant for purposes of his sentencing upon the instant conviction ( see, CPL 400.21; People v. Showler, 209 A.D.2d 1054, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 802). Finally, the sentence imposed is not unduly harsh or severe.


Summaries of

People v. Christian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1996
229 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Christian

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HARRY CHRISTIAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
645 N.Y.S.2d 206

Citing Cases

People v. Ronald

Because defendant did not seek that relief, any claim arising from the possible violation of his Rosario…

People v. Grimes

In any event, he waived that contention when he admitted the prior felony conviction in open court (see…