From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chesson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 2003
303 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-03170

Argued February 11, 2003.

March 3, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered March 22, 2001, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (V. Marika Meis and Sarah Berger of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Nicoletta J. Caferri, and Kimberley C. Nielsen of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in precluding him from introducing extrinsic evidence of the complainant's bias, interest, and hostility is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Inniss, 83 N.Y.2d 653; People v. Munoz, 291 A.D.2d 287; People v. Lewis, 167 A.D.2d 303). In any event, the trial court correctly precluded a defense witness from testifying about collateral matters intended merely to impeach the complainant's credibility (see People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233; People v. Ferere, 294 A.D.2d 596; People v. Abreu, 278 A.D.2d 424).

PRUDENTI, P.J., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Chesson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 2003
303 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Chesson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. RODNEY CHESSON, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 3, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
755 N.Y.S.2d 864

Citing Cases

People v. Cato

Even assuming, arguendo, that the court erred in failing to give the charge, we conclude that the error is…

People v. Alexander

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The trial court providently exercised its discretion in precluding the…