Opinion
January 12, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.).
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
Since this Court is affirming the defendant's conviction under Kings County indictment No. 6200/95 ( see, People v. Chedick, 246 A.D.2d 551 [decided herewith]), upon which the instant conviction for violation of probation is predicated, there is no basis to reverse the amended judgment ( see, People v. Hodges, 207 A.D.2d 360). Moreover, upon the defendant's conviction for a violation of probation, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by imposing a sentence which was consecutive to the term of imprisonment previously imposed under indictment No. 6200/95 ( see, People v. Corie, 222 A.D.2d 602; see also, People v. Wilmot, 208 A.D.2d 968).
Santucci, J.P., Joy, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.