From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chase

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 19, 2003
306 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1483

June 19, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Ward, J.), rendered February 28, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Walter J. Storey, for respondent.

Jonathan M. Kirshbaum, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Rosenberger, Gonzalez, JJ.


Defendant's sentencing was not unreasonably delayed (see People v. Drake, 61 N.Y.2d 359). Since defendant absconded, his argument that the People exercised inadequate diligence is unavailing (see People v. Reyes, 214 A.D.2d 233, lv denied, 87 N.Y.2d 850), especially since the delay was exacerbated by defendant's use of assumed names (see e.g. People v. McQuilken, 249 A.D.2d 35, lv denied, 92 N.Y.2d 901).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Chase

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 19, 2003
306 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Chase

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BARRINGTON CHASE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 19, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
760 N.Y.S.2d 327

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

However, in those cases where the defendant is incarcerated, the prosecution is required to exercise due…

People v. Santana

As a rule, the People have no duty to locate an absconding defendant (CPL 380.20; People v. Chase, 306 A.D.2d…