From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Charnock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1990
163 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

July 13, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.


Case held, decision reserved, motion to relieve counsel's assignment granted, and new counsel to be assigned. Memorandum: Defendant's attorney has moved to be relieved as assigned counsel pursuant to People v. Crawford ( 71 A.D.2d 38) on the ground that no nonfrivolous issues exist on the appeal. Defendant, in his supplemental pro se brief, has raised the issue of legal insufficiency of the evidence, and we find that issue to be nonfrivolous. Accordingly, we relieve counsel of his assignment and assign new counsel to file a substantive brief addressing that issue and any others that counsel's review of the record may disclose (see, People v. Casiano, 67 N.Y.2d 906; People v Cummings, 162 A.D.2d 943).


Summaries of

People v. Charnock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1990
163 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Charnock

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NORMAN J. CHARNOCK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 13, 1990

Citations

163 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
559 N.Y.S.2d 216

Citing Cases

People v. Schneider

Memorandum: It is a denial of effective assistance for appellate counsel to submit a Crawford brief (see,…

People v. Ninham

The determination whether an issue is frivolous rests with the court, not assigned counsel (People v…