From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Charles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 29, 1995

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Kowtna, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that his plea allocution was insufficient to establish his guilt of assault in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt because his statement regarding the incident negated the element of intent. The defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the second degree by "recklessly caus[ing] serious physical injury to another person by means of a deadly weapon or a dangerous instrument" (Penal Law § 120.05). Intent is not an element of this crime (see, People v Gallagher, 69 N.Y.2d 525, 529). Moreover, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, People v Walters, 176 A.D.2d 277, 277-278; CPL 220.60).

The defendant's remaining contention is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Proctor, 79 N.Y.2d 992). O'Brien, J.P., Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Charles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Charles

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GARCIA CHARLES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 355

Citing Cases

People v. McElroy

However, in each of these cases, the defendant was charged or convicted of a crime defined by intentional…

People v. McElroy

We agree with the People's interpretation of Penal Law § 120.05(4) that the reckless mens rea must be read…