From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chandler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 2011
80 A.D.3d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2008-11420.

January 25, 2011.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated November 14, 2008, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Anne Grady of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Covello, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Lott, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant contends that, in determining his risk level under the Sex Offender Registration Act ( see Correction Law art 6-C), the Supreme Court erroneously assessed 10 points against him under risk factor 12 for failure to accept responsibility for his criminal conduct. This contention is without merit. Although the defendant pleaded guilty, his subsequent statements to the Probation Department constituted clear and convincing evidence that he did not genuinely accept responsibility for his criminal conduct ( see People v Murphy, 68 AD3d 832, 833; People v Lesch, 38 AD3d 1129, 1130; People v Wright, 37 AD3d 797, 798; People v Mitchell, 300 AD2d 377, 378).


Summaries of

People v. Chandler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 2011
80 A.D.3d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Chandler

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY CHANDLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 25, 2011

Citations

80 A.D.3d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 497
915 N.Y.S.2d 504

Citing Cases

People v. Thompson

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly assessed 10 points against him under risk…

People v. Shkreli

Here, contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly assessed 10 points against him under…