From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chambers

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 24, 2016
142 A.D.3d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

08-24-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jashid CHAMBERS, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY, for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubost of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY, for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubost of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gubbay, J.), imposed June 23, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., LEVENTHAL, COHEN, LaSALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Chambers

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 24, 2016
142 A.D.3d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Chambers

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jashid CHAMBERS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 24, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5870
36 N.Y.S.3d 824

Citing Cases

People v. Valentin

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid…

People v. Porter

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid…