From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cephas

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 12, 2013
107 A.D.3d 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-12

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Shawn CEPHAS, also known as Sean Cephas, appellant.

Mark Diamond, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Jennifer Spencer, Steven A. Bender, and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.


Mark Diamond, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Jennifer Spencer, Steven A. Bender, and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Neary, J.), rendered October 1, 2008, convicting him of assault in the second degree and menacing in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

At trial, the People presented evidence that the defendant physically attacked the complainant by punching her, kicking her, choking her, dragging her, and slamming her head and face against a parked vehicle. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power ( seeCPL 470.15 [5] ), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the evidence was sufficient to establish that the defendant caused injury to the complainant by means of a dangerous instrument, namely, the vehicle ( seePenal Law §§ 10.00 [13]; 120.05[2]; People v. Galvin, 65 N.Y.2d 761, 762–763, 492 N.Y.S.2d 25, 481 N.E.2d 565;People v. Carter, 53 N.Y.2d 113, 116, 440 N.Y.S.2d 607, 423 N.E.2d 30;People v. Warren, 98 A.D.3d 634, 636, 949 N.Y.S.2d 496).

The trial court did not err in refusing to give a missing witness charge with respect to a witness whose testimony would have constituted hearsay ( see People v. Keen, 94 N.Y.2d 533, 539, 707 N.Y.S.2d 380, 728 N.E.2d 979;People v. Watson, 220 A.D.2d 333, 633 N.Y.S.2d 15;People v. Small, 201 A.D.2d 315, 316, 607 N.Y.S.2d 291).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, LOTT and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cephas

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 12, 2013
107 A.D.3d 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Cephas

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Shawn CEPHAS, also known as Sean Cephas…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 12, 2013

Citations

107 A.D.3d 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4351
966 N.Y.S.2d 684

Citing Cases

People v. Kelly

The defendant's argument with respect to the legal sufficiency of the evidence establishing that he used a…

People v. Cephas

2013-08-19People v. Shawn CephasSmith2d Dept.: 107 A.D.3d 821, 966 N.Y.S.2d 684 (Westchester) Smith,…