From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Central Transport

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 8, 1977
76 Mich. App. 185 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

Docket No. 29013.

Decided June 8, 1977.

Appeal from Wayne, John D. O'Hair, J. Submitted May 12, 1977, at Detroit. (Docket No. 29013.) Decided June 8, 1977.

Central Transport, Inc., and Fred Hosmer were charged with operation of an overweight vehicle, in violation of a City of Dearborn traffic ordinance. Central Transport was convicted in district court. Central Transport appealed to circuit court, which reversed. The city appeals. Reversed, conviction reinstated, and remanded to district court for sentencing.

William C. Hultgren, Corporation Counsel, and William C. Mulcahy, Assistant Corporation Counsel, for the people of the City of Dearborn.

Albert Green (by Michael T. Zajac), for defendants.

Before: BASHARA, P.J., and QUINN and BEASLEY, JJ.


Central Transport, Inc., was convicted in district court of violating § 11.2 (overweight trucks) of plaintiff's traffic code ordinance. Central Transport, Inc. (hereafter defendant) appealed to circuit court, which reversed. The basis of reversal was that scienter was a necessary element of the offense charged and scienter had not been proved. Plaintiff appeals.

The sole issue on appeal is whether scienter is an element of the offense of which defendant was convicted.

The provisions of the ordinance parallel MCLA 257.716(a) and 257.724(c); MSA 9.2416(a) and 9.2424(c). Like MCLA 257.716(a); MSA 9.2416(a), plaintiff's ordinance was amended prior to the violation here involved by eliminating the word "knowingly" from § 11.2A. Prior to amendment, the statute and ordinance read in part, "[i]t is a misdemeanor * * * to cause or knowingly permit to be driven or moved * * *". After amendment, this same portion reads, "[i]t is a misdemeanor * * * to cause or permit to be driven or moved * * *". The amendments came after the decision in People v Barkman, 22 Mich. App. 697; 177 N.W.2d 721 (1970), and demonstrate the intent of the legislative bodies to eliminate scienter as an element of the offense.

Reversed, conviction reinstated and remanded to district court for execution of sentence. Costs to plaintiff.


Summaries of

People v. Central Transport

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 8, 1977
76 Mich. App. 185 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

People v. Central Transport

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v CENTRAL TRANSPORT, INC. (CITY OF DEARBORN v CENTRAL TRANSPORT…

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 8, 1977

Citations

76 Mich. App. 185 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977)
256 N.W.2d 575