From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Celifie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 2001
287 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted September 13, 2001.

October 1, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered October 26, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, illegal possession of a vehicle identification number (two counts), and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Melissa S. Horlick of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Jeanette Lifschitz, and Ushir Pandit of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the trial court effectively deprived him of his right to present a defense by prospectively excluding certain testimony of a defense witness is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Jones, 171 A.D.2d 609). In any event, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in excluding this testimony because it was irrelevant and collateral, and would have invited the jury to engage in speculation (see, People v. Cancel, 176 A.D.2d 748).

ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, McGINITY and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Celifie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 2001
287 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Celifie

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. GEORGE CELIFIE, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
730 N.Y.S.2d 884

Citing Cases

People v. Young

The defendant's contention that the trial court effectively denied him, inter alia, his constitutional right…

People v. Rosado

155; People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1), we nevertheless accord great…