From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Catalano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 16, 1986
124 A.D.2d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

October 16, 1986

Appeal from the County Court of Albany County (Turner, Jr., J.).


In People v Robideau ( 121 A.D.2d 769), we reversed the conviction of defendant's codefendant on the ground that County Court improperly limited the cross-examination of a prosecution witness. We stated there that People v Sandoval ( 34 N.Y.2d 371) may not be used to limit the cross-examination of a nondefendant witness, and that such a witness may be cross-examined with regard to any criminal, vicious or disgraceful acts having a bearing on his credibility. As defendant in this case was tried jointly with his codefendant, our determination in Robideau is equally applicable to the present case. Accordingly, defendant's conviction should be reversed and he should be afforded a new trial.

Judgment reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to the County Court of Albany County for a new trial. Main, J.P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Catalano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 16, 1986
124 A.D.2d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Catalano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL CATALANO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 16, 1986

Citations

124 A.D.2d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Downey

that would require the jury to determine whether the house at issue consisted of ‘two or more units' and…

People v. Downey

Consequently, given the omission of the definition of ["unit"] and/or ["separately secured or occupied,"] the…