From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 2, 2003
301 A.D.2d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

13585

Decided and Entered: January 2, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Hemmett Jr., J.) rendered October 3, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree.

Maynard' O'Connor, Smith Catalinotto L.L.P., Albany (Michael T. Snyder of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Winn, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Bertlen F. Turner of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

In satisfaction of a 14-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree and was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement to consecutive prison terms of four years for each count. We are unpersuaded by defendant's contention that the sentence should be modified because he was not informed of any period of postrelease supervision resulting from his guilty plea. To be sure, "[t]he failure to inform a defendant of the postsupervision component of a sentence does not, in and of itself, provide a basis for modifying the sentence" (People v. Housman, 291 A.D.2d 665, 667, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 638). Here, although a defendant may be entitled to an opportunity to withdraw his plea (see People v. Cooney, 290 A.D.2d 727, lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 752), defendant clearly states in his brief that he wishes to retain his guilty plea and instead requests only that the sentence of postrelease supervision period be modified. In view of the foregoing and finding no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence imposed in the interest of justice, the judgment is affirmed (see People v. Rawdon, 296 A.D.2d 599; People v. Yekel, 288 A.D.2d 762).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Cass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 2, 2003
301 A.D.2d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Cass

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT CASS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 2, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
752 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

People v. Vahedi

At sentencing, the court informed defendant that the six-year determinate sentence it was imposing would be…

People v. Ryan

Thus, the legal conundrum that exists as to the consequences of a complete failure to advise a defendant of…