From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Casiel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 29, 1977
363 N.E.2d 354 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued February 18, 1977

Decided March 29, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, ERNEST L. SIGNORELLI, J.

Charles M. Schutzman for appellant.

Henry F. O'Brien, District Attorney (Mark D. Cohen of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed. In People v Brown ( 40 N.Y.2d 381), this court interpreted recent rulings of the United States Supreme Court as precluding appeal by the People "from an adverse trial ruling whenever such appeal if resolved favorably for the People might require the defendant to stand retrial — or even if it would then be necessary for the trial court `to make supplemental findings'". Since, in this case, correction of any error committed by the trial court would lead to a second trial, as indeed the Appellate Division ordered, the taking of the appeal by the People to the Appellate Division violated the double jeopardy principles considered in Brown. Because the People were constitutionally precluded from appealing to the Appellate Division, the Appellate Division should have dismissed their appeal.

Accordingly, the order appealed from should be reversed and the case remitted to the Appellate Division, with directions that the appeal to that court be dismissed. (People v Baker, 39 N.Y.2d 923, cert den 429 U.S. 868.)

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Casiel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 29, 1977
363 N.E.2d 354 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

People v. Casiel

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WALTER LEE CASIEL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 29, 1977

Citations

363 N.E.2d 354 (N.Y. 1977)
363 N.E.2d 354
394 N.Y.S.2d 630

Citing Cases

People v. Singleton

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the order dismissing the indictment reinstated. If…

People v. Leisner

Since this court has no inherent authority to evaluate the weight of the evidence, but is limited to…